By Mark Trammell
Within the first minute of seeing the trailer for “Inglourious Basterds,” director Quentin Tarantino’s latest, you probably knew whether it was your cup or tea or not. You should trust that instinct. Either the idea of a mustachioed, redneck Brad Pitt and his merry band of Jews out “killin’ Naht-zees” is your bag or it isn’t, simple as that and actually giving the movie its day in court isn’t going to change that initial gut reaction.

Brad Pitt in "Inglourious Basterds"
The good news is, after the minor misstep of “Death Proof,” Tarantino is indeed back in fighting form. Not that “Proof” was that bad, by any means, just subpar in comparison to what came before it (including its sister “Grindhouse” feature, “Planet Terror”—not to mention the faux trailers). With “Basterds,” however, Tarantino is back to his strengths: clever dialogue with more going on beneath the surface than in most scripts, rich characters that make their mark almost immediately even in only a scene or two, and abrupt, startling violence that you rarely see coming—or if you do, manages to be even worse than you might have imagined.
The film features a number of Tarantino trademarks: the book-like chapter structure of the “Kill Bill” saga, the Mexican stand-offs of “Reservoir Dogs” (not to mention the Tarantino-penned “From Dusk Till Dawn,” “Natural Born Killers,” and “True Romance”—this is a guy who likes his Mexican stand-off!), and the withholding of crucial information that slides into place in the end, making you want to immediately see the film again, a la “Pulp Fiction.” In short, it’s everything you ever loved about Tarantino and then some, down to the cribbing of other films’ soundtracks, is present and accounted for. Oh yeah, and stuff blows up real good.
The story is ludicrous and knows it, but doesn’t let that get in the way of showing the viewer a good time. Essentially a revisionist history piece, the film revolves around several groups intent on sabotaging a Nazi Party get-together, including the most crucial member—the man himself, Hitler. That the most vital leaders of the Nazi Party would all be together in one place in such a highly-public fashion at the height of the War when all of the Allieds are gunning for them is, of course, ridiculous and highly improbable, but who cares?
It works because it’s pure and utter fantasy, wish fulfillment of the highest order. The old “if you could go back in time and take out Hitler would you?” query made flesh and blood, with a particular emphasis on the latter. Indeed, over the course of the film, people are scalped, shot, bludgeoned with a baseball bat, knifed, and plenty more atrocities where that came from. Hey, what did you expect, a tea party? This is a “killin’ Naht-zees” free for all!
Still, the film isn’t above giving the viewer—and its characters—time to breathe. Despite the prominence in the trailers, Pitt and his marauding titular troop are actually a minor part of the story, though Pitt doesn’t let that stop him from handily stealing every scene he’s in. It may well be his best work to date, in fact—or at least his most consistently entertaining.
The real focus is on two main characters: Shoshanna Dreyfus (Melanie Laurent), an escaped Jew masquerading as a French theatre owner; and Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), who is the more subtle—most of the time, anyway—Nazi equivalent of Pitt’s hunter character. It is at Shoshanna’s theatre that the aforementioned get-together occurs, putting her in prime position to do a little Nazi-killing her own bad self. Meanwhile, Landa is making the rounds, looking for Jews at Hitler’s behest and exterminating them accordingly. Both are singular and exceptionally-rendered characterizations. Don’t be surprised if either actor ends up with at least an Oscar nomination for their efforts here. Waltz in particular runs the gamut from scarily charming to silly to scary as all get out—sometimes all at once, and that’s no mean feat. The opening scene alone, with Landa scrutinizing a potential Jewish sympathizer, is fraught with all manners of tension to the point of being nearly unbearable. It isn’t long before we realize every scene featuring Landa will be as well, which is a testament to Waltz’s incredible skills as an actor. He’s worth seeing the film for alone.
Also worth mentioning is a brief appearance by erstwhile Austin Powers Mike Myers, redeeming himself for “The Love Guru” in a manner of minutes; and a strong turn by German-born Diane Kruger, doing the same for…well, pretty much her whole career thus far, save perhaps the underrated “Wicker Park.” Even the supporting actors manage to make a strong impression in a handful of scenes, including “Hostel”-director Eli Roth as the aforementioned bat-wielder known as “The Bear Jew;” “The Office” star B.J. Novak as Pitt’s right-hand man; “Kill Bill” co-star Julie Dreyfus as the posh Francesca (love the tiger hat!), Goebbels’ French concubine; and especially Til Schweiger, who has one of the best movie introductions ever as the take-no-prisoners Sgt. Hugo Stiglitz, a German-born Nazi killing machine.
Okay, so this is more Tarantino having a good time than anything else, but it still ranks right up there with the best of his work thus far, with more memorable scenes than you can shake a bat at. Oh yes, it is jarringly violent—movies that use violence properly should be—but it’s also a hell of a wild ride, and at half the length of either “Grindhouse” or “Kill Bill” in their entirety, so there’s that. In short, if you’ve always wanted to see wholesale Nazi killing, boy, are you in for the ride of your life. Strap in and hold on for dear life!